Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scenarica's avatar

Norway's edge isn't that they find more talent. It's that they lose less of it. Early specialisation selects for whoever is best at age 10, which is mostly whoever is biggest at age 10. That filters out every kid who would have been elite at 18 but hadn't finished growing yet. The Norwegian system keeps the pool open long enough for talent to separate from physical maturity, and by the time the selection happens the late developers have arrived.

5.6 million people producing more elite athletes than 330 million isn't a miracle. It's maths. America narrows the funnel at age 8 and wonders why the adults who come out the other end aren't as good. Norway keeps the funnel wide until 13 and lets biology finish the conversation that coaches started too early everywhere else. The talent was always there. The system just stopped throwing it away before it could show up.

Sal Scarantino's avatar

Interesting cultural observations, although I'm not sure the causation lines hold up. I suppose it's safe to say that all of these factors have made some contribution to athletic excellence.

No posts

Ready for more?